In a recent development, the Federal Capital Territory High Court has taken a decision regarding a fundamental human rights lawsuit filed by Sa’adatu Yaro, an employee of the Central Bank of Nigeria. Yaro’s lawsuit was directed against the Department of State Services (DSS) and revolved around the seizure of her six high-end vehicles on July 12, as well as her plea for bail from the ongoing detention.
The background of this case is linked to the ongoing N6.9 billion procurement fraud case, a matter brought forward by the Federal Government against the suspended governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, Godwin Emefile. Yaro finds herself in the capacity of the second defendant in this complex legal battle. Intriguingly, Yaro’s absence in the proceedings had led to a temporary halt in the trial’s commencement, indicating the significance of her involvement.
In a motion on notice marked FCT/HC/CV/6918/23, Yaro’s lawyer, J.B Daudu SAN, presented a compelling argument before the court. The essence of the argument lies in the declaration of Yaro’s arrest on July 12, 2023, her husband’s detention, and the confiscation of her six luxury vehicles as blatant infringements upon her fundamental human rights. Daudu’s line of reasoning extended further, asserting that the Department of State Services, while not constituting an anti-graft agency, lacks both the jurisdiction and statutory authority to delve into the intricate business dealings of the applicant.
Highlighting the urgency and severity of the situation, Daudu emphasized the alleged mistreatment faced by Yaro while under the custody of the DSS since her detention on July 12. According to the argument put forth, this prolonged detention, coupled with reported instances of torture, stands as a stark violation of Yaro’s constitutional rights, specifically her Right to Dignity of Human Person and Right to Personal Liberty—rights unequivocally guaranteed by Sections 34 and 35 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
The court’s decision to dismiss the fundamental human rights suit has undoubtedly sparked debates within legal circles and among concerned citizens alike. The case sheds light on the intricate interplay between legal jurisdiction, constitutional rights, and the power wielded by different government agencies. As this legal battle unfolds, its outcome is anticipated to set significant precedents and potentially impact the broader discourse surrounding the balance between security measures, individual liberties, and the rule of law in Nigeria.
